Gene McDonald on Astrobiology Lab Exercises (05/01/03)
I agree with the earlier comment
that astrobiology lab exercises need to be
"
real" labs and not just paper exercises. I
have been helping some
colleagues introduce some astrobiology material
into a non-majors astronomy
course that includes a observing lab, and it's
a challenge to come up with
an astrobiology-related "wet lab" exercise
that's logistically feasible in
an astronomy department (where most of these courses
seem to be taught).
Even if an astrobiology-oriented textbook like
Bennett, Shostak, and
Jakosky is used, it's also a challenge to give
the students enough basic
understanding of biology, chemistry, geology, etc.
to appreciate a "wet"
experiment that is worth doing. If anybody has
any ideas or experiments
that have worked I'd love to hear about them.
As far as source material, I've found a couple
of promising lab exercises
(which I haven't tried out yet) in the Journal
of Chemical Education.
Other science education journals are probably good
places to look as well.
Gene McDonald <Gene.D.McDonald@jpl.nasa.gov>
Carney:
On Life in the Universe Activities Manual (11/01/02)
I received a copy of the Prather/Offerdahl/Slater
book [Life in the Universe Activities Manual] from
Addison Wesley earlier this week and have been
reviewing it. It is much more “activity” based
and doesn’t include “lab experiments.” For
our course, we are aiming for a combination of
these two types of activities. Even for non-science
majors, I think it is important that they “get
their hands dirty” doing an actual experiment,
recording their own data, drawing conclusions,
and writing it up. Out of say, 9 exercises, at
least 3 will be of this type. The AW activities
manual has been very helpful, though, and I’m
happy to know of its existence. It seems it is
the first of its kind, other than K-12 type activities.
Diane Carney <diviana@u.washington.edu>

Gaffey: Distance learning (10/31/02)
I teach a course called “Life in the Universe” .
We have a large number (~350) of students in
our distance master’s program in Space
Studies. So our courses are first taught on campus
and video tapes made of those lectures. Then
it is taught as a distance course the next semester,
where the students are supplied with the tapes
and the PowerPoint lecture notes, and discussions
(one hour per week) are held during an internet
chat session. My on-campus class had 22 students
(undergrad and grad) in the spring semester of
2002, and my distance class had 38 students (all
in the master’s program) during the summer
of 2002.
Michael Gaffey <gaffey@space.edu>

Jakosky:
Course emphasizing science & society
(10/29/02)
Astrobiology and the potential
for life elsewhere generate widespread interest
with the public. They
also represent one of the intellectual drivers
of NASA’s solar system exploration program,
as outlined in the recent NRC decadal report. We
have the opportunity to take advantage of this
interest by using astrobiology as a hook through
which we can educate the public on the meaning
of science, the value of basic research and exploration,
and the broader roles of science in our society
today. However, these topics are usually not discussed
within the science community or in the teaching
of future scientists at either the undergraduate
or graduate levels, so that astrobiologists are
not well positioned to take on this task. We have
attempted to fill this gap with a graduate and
senior-level course on the nature of science and
society, intended for science majors and incipient
scientists.
Topics that we discuss include a brief introduction
to the science of astrobiology, the nature of science
and philosophy of science as applied to astrobiology,
the religious issues connected to life elsewhere,
the history of science and the popular and scientific
interest in extraterrestrial life, the definition
of life, the recent history of astrobiology (the
rise of exobiology, the Viking biology experiments,
the ALH84001 controversy, the relationship between
astrobiology and solar-system exploration, etc.),
the nature of sentience and the potential for extraterrestrial
intelligence, the interactions between the sciences
and the humanities, the cultural influence of astrobiology
(including science fiction, movies and TV, UFOs,
and the Face on Mars), and the philosophical significance
of finding or not finding life elsewhere.
The approach of the class is to discuss the relationship
between science and society, from the perspective
of the practicing scientist. Although undergraduate
and graduate students usually are not well trained
in the philosophical, historical, or societal issues,
the students can play an important role in addressing
the boundary between the doing of science and the
influence that the science has on society. The
goal is to eventually foster a true dialog between
scientists and non-scientists, and to encourage
scientists to think about the broader implications
for non-scientists of astrobiology research.
Readings from the class include original literature
in the areas of philosophy of science (Popper,
Kuhn, Feyerabend), history of science (Aristotle,
Plato, Darwin), religion (Pope John Paul II), history
of astrobiology (the scientific literature dealing
with Viking, ALH84001), current status of astrobiology
(the recent NRC reports on astrobiology), and science
and society (C.P. Snow), as well as synthesis and
integration of the issues by modern scholars.
Bruce M. Jakosky <bruce.jakosky@lasp.colorado.edu>

Neuenschwander: Hands-on course in Costa Rica
(09/03/02)
Let me tell you about our astrobiology course.
Actually it's an inverted astrobiology: instead
of looking outward for life on other planets, it
looks inward, to focus on the astrophysics that
makes biology possible on this planet.
We team-teach the course in
Costa Rica (in the Talamanca Mountains, where
our university maintains
a field station with lab and dormitory space).
The course is called "The Astronomical Basis
of Life on Earth." We presented a poster on
it at the Albuquerque [AAS] meeting. The course's
theme emphasizes how the conditions necessary for
life are
constrained by astronomical realities. For example,
stellar evolution provides the energy, elements,
and timescale required for biological evolution.
At our university's field station in Costa Rica,
where every surface is ALIVE, the astronomy that
makes it all possible hits you with an in-your-face
immediacy. When discussing the nuclear reactions
that power the sun, and having described its energy
transport mechanisms, we take a series of hikes
to see the diverse light-gathering strategies of
the plants in the forest, how those photons are
used. When discussing tides, we're up to our necks
in one on the Pacific coast.
Astronomically speaking, Quetzal
DNA is a metal, a way of thinking about biology
and the history
of atoms that is new to most of our students.When
discussing volcanism on Mars and Io, we are within
sight and earshot of the pyroclastic Arenal Volcano,
standing in the craters made by projectile impact.
The timescale necessary for biological evolution
is made possible by the sun's lifetime and the
mean collision time between stars... These are
the kinds of links we make in the course. It generalizes
immediately to outward-looking astrobiology too.
I would like to add that our astrobiology course
in Costa Rica has strongly influenced the "regular" introductory
astronomy course that we also teach at our Oklahoma
campus.
Dwight E. Neuenschwander <dneuensc@snu.edu> 09/03/02

Hanson: Course with enrollment of 300 (08/30/02)
I have now taught an astrobiology course for two
years and will teach it again this spring. We've
offered this course for more than 10 years, previously
taught by the other astronomer in our dept., Michael
Sitko. I had a much easier time putting the course
together, I believe. Since I was starting from
scratch (I can't teach from other people's notes),
I was able to integrate all the most recent discoveries
and theories into the course.
Enrollment was over 300 this spring!
I would be interested in sharing ideas/resources/pedagogy
with others also teaching such a course.
Margaret Hanson <hanson@physics.uc.edu> 08/30/02

Bobrowsky: Article in The Physics Teacher (08/19/02)
I have taught Astrobio, although
the university billed it as Astrobio 301, requiring
Astro 101
(not Astrobio 101) as a prerequisite. I also include
astrobiology in my Astro 101 course (which I teach
both in the classroom as well as in an online [Web-based]
format for "distance education" students).
My interactions with students on the topic of
astrobiology prompted me to write an article for
The Physics Teacher on teaching evolutionary ideas
to skeptical students (The Physics Teacher, Vol.
38, p. 565, 2000).
Matthew Bobrowsky <mbobrows@nova.umuc.edu> 08/19/02

Cabanela: Suggestions for astrobiology website
(08/19/02)
I am all in favor of the dissemination of information
of aid in the teaching of Astrobiology, but what
format do you want this website to take? I suspect
that it might be more productive to not simply
discuss _whether_ such a website should exist (I
think most people would be in favor of it), but
rather to discuss site contents....
Potential Contents that would be appropriate for
the site:
+ Astrobiological News: This would be updated
as major/minor stories break in
the field, so that we educators can be apprised of research in the field in
more detail than the New York Times offers.
+ Astrobiological Resources: This would be a listing not only of online
resources, but also of books, textbooks, articles, or other media. I
would base the initial version of this on your previously emailed listing
books of use in the field, which I found very interesting and useful.
+ Teaching Resources: This is a new field with major opportunities
for cross-disciplinary teaching. It is also a challenge because until
recently textbooks didn't exist in the field and most of us only have
formal training in "one subdiscipline" of astrobiology. It might
be
nice to see what other people are trying. Starting with Course outlines,
lab ideas, etc.
Juan Cabanela <jcabanel@haverford.edu>

Olendzenski: Microscope website (08/16/02)
In our effort to make the micro*scope website
a central place for Astrobiology education resources,
I would like to offer that we also make your information
for college-level educators available through our
site (www.mbl.edu/microscope).
Lorraine Olendzenski <lco95001@uconnvm.uconn.edu>

Irvine: Video teaching resources 08/15/02
I have found that the parts
of the video series "Intimate
Strangers", produced by the American Society
for Microbiology and the NSF for public television,
are very good --- particularly "The Tree of
Life". And I also use some of the videos in
the Complete Cosmos series.
William Irvine <irvine@fcrao1.astro.umass.edu>

Durison: Experimental course (08/14/02)
I taught a somewhat experimental class in Fall
2001 to about 50 students here at Indiana University
as part of our ``topics'' curriculum for undergraduates.
It was called ``Finding Places to Live: Astronomical
Constraints on the Existence of Habitable Worlds
in the
Universe''. I couldn't call it Life in the Universe
because some physicist had already claimed that
title. The students were formed into groups based
on a choice of book to read.
There were regular interactive exercises, book
reports, and group presentations on their books,
as well as standard lecture-style presentation
of material. I also used a workbook I created based
on the Drake Formula. I am not sure what exactly
you want to know, but I am definitely interested
in what others have done and plan to do. And I
am willing, time permitting, to share aspects of
what I did.
Dick Durison <durisen@astro.indiana.edu>

Theison: Bibliography and study guide available
(08/13/02)
We met at the ASP meeting in Pasadena
a couple years ago. At that time I was working
on an "Astrobiology Bibliography: An Annotated
List of Recent Books (1990 to present) on Extraterrestrial
Life and Intelligence". This has now been
updated and is available online:
http://www.astro.umd.edu/~theison/bibliography.html
In addition, I should have
a paper called "An
Upper Level Astrobiology Course with Discussion
Sections" (that describes the Life in the
Universe class I've taught for the last 15 years
here at the University of Maryland) published in
the proceedings of IAU Symposium 213 "Bioastronomy
2002: Life Among the Stars". Part of this
paper will be available online with the bibliography
mentioned above. A student study guide on *2001:
A Space Odyssey* that I use in this class is already
available at
http://www.astro.umd.edu/~theison/2001/2001studyguide.html
Using science fiction in a life in the universe
class is not for everyone but I believe this study
guide would be useful for people who think this
approach might be valuable.
Dave Theison <theison@astro.umd.edu>

|